View Facsimile
1679 181 (115
____________________________________________________________________________
which your selves aforehand doe declare to be the portion which you fear we
shall meet with, Especially if it be fully declared th to the churches how things
have bin carried amongst us, & what has past in writing between the council and
the church : I concluded with a passage of Mr Davenports in his Book intitled
The power of Congregational Churches page 150.
“ Godly wisdome is to be Exercised in makeing a difference between cause & cause
“ which will not suffer churches to conneive at grossor Scandalls, nor to withdraw
“ the right hand of fellowship from any church upon smal differences in judgment
“ nor practise, much less for censureing, & holding under censure Impenitent persons
“ when the Scandelous obstinacy of delinquents is res propria to that church; though
“ some other churches (being misled by their guides, who possibly may side more then
“ they ought with the delinquent out of som secret grudg against the Elders of that
“ Church) declare it to be their iudgment that the party should not have bin layd
“ under that censure, or should now be released from it : To withdraw the right
“ hand of fellowship from a church for such a cause, is contrary to Rules of true wis=
“ dome If a church be found in the fayth & order of the gospel, greater matters then ys
“ will cause noe breach of comunion between churches, wher brotherly comunion is Excercis
“ ed with true humility & godly wisdome.[105] _____
There was noe deliverance wrought for us by the two meetings of this council but
they left us in a worse condition then they found us, but as their Reverend Moderator
Mr Ward sayd they found a spark at Rowley & left a flame, for wheras ther were
but 3. that voted on ye negative as to Mr Nelsons Ejection, by the comming of the coun
-cill 15 or 17 Brethren expressed their consent to sit down with the councills result
which the major part of the church could not doe, wherfore we desired our dissen
ting brethren to ioyne with the major part in calling a council of churches but they
would not saying we have had an able council already and we are satisfied with
their determination, and as the council had declared themselves offended withersoe
did our brethren soe that we could not have a sacramt, if we had they told us they
must withdraw, we then desired them to ioyne in petioning to the general court
yt they would send us a council of churches or a comitty as they saw meet but
they would not ioyne with the major part of the church in any such petition, &
therfore we petioned our selves to the general court May 28 1679 who did not
that Sessions agree to send us any help (hopeing we might agree amongst our selves)
but told us that if we could not agree if we renewed our petition in ye next sessi
ons viz Octob 15 1679 they would send a council which accordingly they did
4 churches of the first council Ipsw. Newberry, Hampton Haverhil, & 6 new
churches the 3 churches in Boston, Salem Beverly, Portsmouth. who conveened
according to ye order of the General Court Novemb. 19 1679. being 4th day of ye
week Mr Allin of Boston Mr Higginson, Mr Cobbet, Mr Ward Captain Walley
Deacon Allin of Boston were absent : noe little conflict ther was between the
two councills soe that it was feared nothing would have bin done when
two days were spent and great care was taken not to reflect upon the proceedings
of the formar council; which yet they could not but doe if they would discharg yr
consciences as some of them did express themselves they blamed not the churches act
In Excomunicating Mr Nelson without previous admonition but sayd the Censure as
to ye substance of it was just righteous & vallid, and they blamed Mr Nelson for se
veral Evills that the formar council called for noe acknowledgmt off as 1
his falls accusing Deacon Jewit of unrighteousness 2 his actings about the
deaf lad 3 his going to ye sacramt at Ipswich &c.
[105] John Davenport, The power of Congregational churches asserted and vindicated in answer to a treatise of Mr. J. Paget intituled The defence of church-government exercised in classes and synods (London, 1672), 150.