View Facsimile
96 162 1677
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
June 17 the church stayd to conclude of or church meeting about the 3 brethren
that had offended by their disorderly carriages in word & deed Mr Nelson Br Platts
Br Holmes I propounded for the place of meeting whether at my house or in ye meeting
house Mr Nelson sayd if ye church mett at my house he would not come at it I
told him if the church did think it convenient ther to meet it did not become
him soe to speak, I desired that hims: & the other 2 brethren would not absent
yms: he sayd it was noe matter whether they were present we could goe on in
our business a bold & contemptious speech both for ys matter & his maner of speak
ing it
June 19 1677 The Church mett at ye meeting house at 2 of ye clock in ye
afternoon: we began wth Mr Nelson for the breach of ye 5 comand in 6 particulars
he acknowledg 1 The reproachfull speech of ye church meeting & his refusing to come & his
saying what care I who is speaking: but for carrying me to ye court 2 his speech
before the collect at my hous 3 his refusing yt bond wch was done in his waight in main
tenour & stirring up ye whole town to ye like contempt he acknowledg not his fault
At ys meeting he twice publickly told me that prejudice & mallice had stired me
up to present him in a church way
And yt according to my own Exposition of ye 6th comand I had broaken it instancing
in yt Scripture 1 Sam 1 8 9 wch I sayd was a murdering look such a look or soe I had
set my eye upon him & ye other offending brethren ever since that day they voted wth
ye Toun for Mr Sheperds Keeping a fortnight lecture
_________
Br Homes acknowledged his evill in charging the captain with cheating but for his
foul accusations of Neh: Jewitt (1 That he had by his wicked informations mislead ye arbi
trators 2 Yt it was in vayne to speak to Neh: of what was amiss for nothing could be
gott off him but Squibs & Scornes & high flowne Speeches) he acknowledged not his sin
nor made out his accusations to be grounded nor ye breech of ye 9th comand
Br Platts sayd as to both his offences he was not convinced of any evill in ym but if he
might have ye 5 Elders to give ye judgmt if yei sayd he had offended he should submitt
___________
13. Septemb 1677 the honourd committee of ye general court mett at Salisbury & desired Mr
Hale & S P to accompany them wher they gave their result as followeth
we whos names are subcribed appointed by the honourable general court may 23 77
Upon our repair to Salisbury & action given to all partyes to yeild their attendance
a full hearing & plea being allowed to Major Pike, & ye Revernd Mr Wheelwright and
others of the church concerned: we find that though the original fault charged on
matter of
Major Pike was not a plain Imorality & Scandall, yet yt in ye after managmt
^
and prosecution of ye difference between hims & the W. Pastor he hath shewed hims
too litigious in Impeaching him with soe many articles under his hand, thereby
procureing great disturbance to ye church & place
And alsoe much contempt of the sayd W Person & offence in publickly reflecting up
on him these words of Math 7. 5 cast out ye beam &c. & of him & ye church in his
sudding withdrawing & with much contempt refusing their judgmt, as is prooved
against him: of all wch we expect his candid acknowledgmt
Neither can we excuse Mr W. of too much precipitancy in pronouncing a sen
tance of excomunication upon Major Pike, without further tryall for repentance ac-
cording to ye voat of the church If he repent not, aggravated in yt ye offence was
primarily personal, & yrby plainly hazarding the breach of ye church being but 9
and 7 wch sadly came to pass
We condemn the evill practise of thos of the church & Town that did indea
vour in their petition to ye general court to Eject Mr W: from his ministry
by rendering him to be ye cause of the disturbances, & that his ministry had a ten
dency to inflame the minds of pp one against another, a practise of soe dange
rous a consequence, that not onely the contraries but those that were