View Facsimile
1678. 167 103
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Mr Nelson was informed what churches the church of Rowley did object a
=gainst as to hearing the matter between him & the church but he took noe no
tice of it but made his address to them & to three churches more, who accordingly
came & sat in Councill the 10 day of Decemb: 1678 from Ipswich 5 Major Denison
Mr Cobbet, Mr Rogers, Deacon Penkrin, Deacon Goodew
From Topsfield Mr Hubbard Mr Perkins Deacon Perkins
From Newberry Mr Richardson Mr Noyer Mr Caleb Moody Mr Woodbridg
From Hampton Mr Cotton Mr Dolton
From Haverhill Mr Ward Captain Saltinstal Leut: Broune
The first day of the Councills conveening in ye afternoon they gave notice yt
they would hear from the Church the grounds of their proceeding with Mr Nelson
and for yt End desired us to meet them at ye meeting house, which accordingly
we did and after prayer by the moderator the Reverend Mr Ward, The major Ge
neral Denison received a paper from Mr Nelson which the church never saw
fals
before which took up above half an hour to read it, contayning many reproaches
reflections & charges against the church as 1 that ye church was partial in her dealings
with offendours let goodm Pickard goe Scott-free though censured by ye court for his reflecting
speeches against authority & yet prosecuted him for his offences 2 admitted a member against the
mind of ye major part of ye cburch 3 in dealing with him he declared publickly (before ye coun
cil & countrey) that we would not admitt the evidences he gave in to ye church but rejected ym
The body of ye church were much offended with thes fals accusations and sent a message to ye
councill (who were mett at Mr Nelsons house) desiring to have the paper & a copy of It that we
might make answer to it, & it was sayd by some of the councill yt our request was rational
& it was told or messenger yt ye Revend moderator Mr Ward should bring it when he came to
his lodging at S. P. but upon 2d thoughts they altered their mind & kept it from us.
After reading of that reproachfull paper we gave in in writing to ye councill the
grounds of or proceeding against Mr Nelson as followeth.
The grounds upon wch ye church of Rowley proceeded as to their late act
in Excommunicating Mr Philip Nelson, presented to ye hond councill the Elders & messen
gers of ye five churches (of Ipswich, Newberry, Haverhill Hampton & Topsfeild) con
veened at Rowley this 10th of ye 10th month 1678. Upon the complaint and at the
desier of the sayd Mr Nelson, who complaines that he cannot look upon himself to
be Either regularly or justly Excomunicated
Honoured Reverend & beloved in our lord Jesus
Before we mention the grounds of our proceeding as to Mr Nelsons Ejection we crave
leav to premise a few words
1 That as we beleeve councills to be a holy ordinance of God, & very necessary for ye
well being of churches, soe we should very readily have sought for yt help, If we had mett
with any matter of Scruple or difficulty in these matters, for It is noe question with us
whether a man guilty of Such crimes as are hereafter specified should not be cast out
ther appearing noe repentance for 4 of his Scandelous evills nor any thing worth the
nameing for the fifth, notwithstanding what private & publick means were used for that
End, & therfore we did & doe judg it an abuse of soe solemn an ordinance as council
is to call a councill in this case ______
2. Whereas it may be sayd that admonition had bin meet before the highest
censure: we answer in gross & scandelous offences (such as we conceive Mr Nelsons
to be) such gradual proceeding is neither required in the word[76] that we know off
nor is consonant to ye Plattforme nor to the writings of our congregational divines
Dr Owen Mr Cotton &c.[77] Nor to the frequent practise of the churches as might easily
be demonstrated if need be
3 Wheras it may be sayd we were very hasty in casting him out: We Answer it
is well towards half a year that these matters have bin in hand (all which time we
have had noe sacramt of the lords supper) myself & several brethren assaying to
bring him to a sight of his Evills but nothing prevailed soe that we conceive we
have
[76] I.e., God’s Word, or the Bible.
[77] Cambridge Platform, ch. XIV, sec. III; John Cotton, Way of the Churches of Christ in New England, ch. V, sec. II, pp. 92-93; John Owen, possibly his Excertitations on the Epistle to the Hebrews (1668), pp. 291-94, in which he treats the different degrees of “exclusion” practiced in Judaism.