View Facsimile
1 1666 67
______________________________________________________________________________
a Record of Cases in ye Church of Rowley since Nov: 15. 1666
Robert Swanne. brought before the church Jan: 8 1665. upon suspicion of theft, the
fact was - his by Night filching of Corne in ye sheafe five shockes (by his acknowledging)
from of a piece of his ground, plowed & sowed by his neighbor Webster of Haverhill
the corne ō wch land of Webstr claimed, & had procured a sentence for theft from
court. R. Swanne pleaded yt it was his own corne, & though he had done foolishly
to take it by Night for wch the Court had passd such a sentence, yet it was his own
& being ō his own land it must seem be made appeare by Webster the Contrary - and
he pleaded that he intended (being so able) to proove Webster had so acknowledged
The Church not seeing convicting proofe, warned Him from litigis Courses &c:
Robert Swan accused of his ffather for a Letter contayning (as he sayd)
sundrey th:s false (an accursed Lettr) (as he sayd) the matter was first
heared in private & ye sense of ye Elders about it was given to ye church
some dissenting, ye matter was propounded to ye Revd. Mr Cobbet, Mr Hubbard
& Mr Whipple who issued it thus yt (we doe conceive[)] yt Robt Swan did
ought to acknowledge yt he did ill in writing such a Lettr contayning some
expressions of Undutyfulln: & Irreverence wch might justly grieve any
one Xtiā ffather who had in any measure answerd ye Duty of yt Relation
(as we know not but Rich: Swan hath) And yt his ffather ought
(it was sayd privately) (for peace sake) accept such acknowledgemt
& to wthold no pledge of his fatherly Love, for ye future, and yt
ye Letter & Coppy (of wch ye offence did arise[)] be burned.]
This Council was approoved (all things considred) by or selves o. 2.[59] and
submitted Unto by ye Father and Sonne ––––
Mem: that this mr was disorderly mentioned i.e. publickly in a Church
meeting at first. 2. it was disorderly handled 1st by a Committee 3 [-] 4
Brethren joyned wth ye Elders . 3. many then in ordr to issue it and
prepare it for ye Church. 3. There were many th:s sayd & no Care
to proove till no witnesses produced at all to many things sayd
& those wch were prooved we had many Meetings before men would
take Care to bring ym. 4 ye Bretheren under No Rule about
speech & silence. NB that it was quasi a principle amo[ngst][60]
that Every Brother must Speake. 5. That ye Church had
Voted & yet ye Church had forgotten whither it was so or no –-
6. a Censure of Admonition was agreed upō & One meeting
& ommitting to pronounce it prsently ō ye offendour, was
delayed at his Disire to have patience tryed. & ye affect
of it was yt the next meeting, the Church retracted yt
judgmt deserted ye Elders, & ye offendor was now hard to
Deale wth then Ever. 7. That it was a principle of
Pitty to Robt: in ye Consciences of all bad or feared to be so,
& some Envy to ye ffather & prejudice, they were afrayd
the son should be made worse yn he was, & unwilling ye
ffather should be so good accounted worse yn he seemed
July 28. the paper was read to ye Cong Church under the hands of ye
Councill (supra) & accepted Nomine Contradicente [illeg.][61]
[59] Possibly shorthand.
[60] Conjecture where edge of MS is damaged.
[61] “None contradicting” The remainder of the line is obscured by MS damage.