Preparations for the Next Session of the General Court

    956. To Israel Williams, 17 March 1772

    957. To John Pownall, 18 March 1772

    958. To John Worthington, 19 March 1772

    959. To Sir Francis Bernard, 23 March 1772

    While he prepared to meet the General Court on 8 April, Hutchinson wrote to his supporters in western Massachusetts urging them to attend the forthcoming session, if only because the issue of the province’s western boundary with New York was likely to come under consideration. At the same time, he and Lieutenant Governor Andrew Oliver wrote articles in the Boston newspapers and a newly formed, government-party political magazine called The Censor intended to inflame jealousies within the patriot opposition.

    956. To Israel Williams

    Boston 17 March 1772

    Dear Sir, Your messenger being to return in a few hours after I received your letter I have not time to send you the Commissions you desire1 and as it is my present purpose to meet the Court the 8. April I could wish to deliver them to you at Cambridge for I cannot dispense with your attending there. At least something may be done to pave the way for coming down again in May. I will talk with you when I see you about the NYork business. For the Towns granted by this Province I think the Court may with propriety interest it self, the late grants made by New Hampshire cannot be so well supported. I have not time to say any thing upon any other subject. I am Sir Your faithful humble servant,

    RC (Massachusetts Historical Society, Israel Williams Papers).

    957. To John Pownall

    Boston 18 March 1772

    Dear Sir, Mr Sewall the Attorney General for this Province & Judge of the Admiralty for Nova Scotia &c. having received a letter from London which gives him concern least some proposals made to him of giving up his place of Judge upon the payment of an annual Salary by his Successor should give offence to His Majesty’s Ministers of State presses me to send a Letter to Sr F Bernard who is acquainted with the whole that passd to or from Mr Sewall on that affair & to desire him to make a representation of it.1 I know that when the proposal first came to Mr Sewall he was informed that no objection would be made to it by Administration and I do not believe he would otherwise have given ear to it. But Sr Francis is so fully acquainted with the affair that it is unnecessary for me to say any thing upon it.

    My Ld Hillsboroughs letter by the December mail was very welcome I having for a long time wishd to be freed from my suspence.2 I intend to meet the Court the 8 Ap. at Camb and if they will desire me to carry them to Boston meerly because it is most convenient I shall think my self at liberty to do it but if they adhere to their former votes & resolutions I will not comply with their desire nor shall I think my self at liberty to call a new Assembly at Boston in May next. The poor prisoner Rich. is at large.3 It has cost me great pains to save him & the Officer & Soldiers from popular rage & malice & it gives me great satisfaction to see it effected. I am sure Richardson is obliged to you for the trouble you have had about his pardon. The people have never been in so good a temper to submit to his discharge at any time since he was first committed. Our News paper writers will continue their seditious incendiary pieces until the Authors of the like or worse with you are punished but of late they are but little regarded. I am with very great regard & esteem,

    AC (Massachusetts Archives, SC1/series 45X, 27:305); at foot of letter, “J. P. Esq.”

    958. To John Worthington

    Boston 19 March 1772

    Dear Sir, You will see by the News Paper that I intend to meet the Court the 8 of Ap. When I pitched upon that time I was not without a view to your convenience as you may take Worcester Inferior Court in your way down & the Superior Court in your way home. I have no doubt one or more of the Bost members will try to perplex Government as much as ever but I think they will not all concur in evry measure so fully as they have done & I flatter my self that by the aid of the Gentlemen westward we may have a more pacific session than we have had since I came to the chair—but if you decline coming I shall have little or no hopes of it.

    I shall have a proposal to communicate from Gov Tryon concerning our line with NY and I suppose there will be some measures proposed in the House for vindicating the proprietors of the Towns granted by this Province beyond Con. River against the claim of N York. The latter is only my suspicion from what I have heard said upon that Subject. Both these Affairs concern you Gentlemen at the Westward. But I know a regard to the Interest of the Province in general will be sufficient to induce you to come to Court. I am Dear Sir Your faithful humble Servant,

    AC (Massachusetts Archives, SC1/series 45X, 27:306); at foot of letter, “Colo Worthington.”

    959. To Sir Francis Bernard

    Boston 23. March 1772

    Dear Sir, Letters from Mr Bernard & Mr Logan oblige me to make up a packet for you. I have nothing of importance to mention to you nor has there been any occurrence which deserves My Lord Hillsboroughs notice since I wrote His Lordship by the NYork Packet. I take this opportunity to do the Lieutenant Governor justice. That he might not be useless to Government he has published many pieces in a Paper called the Censor under the signature of Freeman which have been very well received.1

    The strange notion of Independence was so generally favoured that I thought it necessary people should have a just view of the constitution & gave the facts & the ground work of the piece signed A Z. in the paper of the 5 March but the chief part is of the Lieutenant Governor’s composure & I think it has silenced the writers of the other side & I am informed has opened the eyes of great part of the Country where it has been spread.2 As there is nothing of your private concerns in this & the other Letter by this Vessel I send them unsealed that in case of your absence they may come to Mr Pownalls view.

    You see by the papers a breach is began which I wish may never be healed.3 I am Dear Sir Your most unfeignedly,

    AC (Massachusetts Archives, SC1/series 45X, 27:306).

    960. To Sir Francis Bernard

    Boston 30 March 1772

    Dear Sir, I have been in great distress near 24 hours after the receipt of a letter from Mr Gambier by Calef. He mentions your having been attacked with a fit & that he had heard nothing from you afterwards. At length Mr John has found a letter in Calefs chest from Lady Bernard which explains it to be paralytick and I will not suffer my self to think that you have not recovered from it. If your health is not fully restored let me beseech you to try the horse and not by short rides but journeys. I have never been paralytick but once in about a dozen or fifteen years I have been unstrung my nerves relaxed & have lost my sleep.1 Nothing else has served me. That will not do unless you throw off every thing that vexes you especially the particular trouble which perhaps may have contributed more than any other but riding will help you to do that a succession of new objects employing the mind. I dont wish you to say anything to me upon business until you are quite well. I am Dear Sir Yours sincerely,

    AC (Massachusetts Archives, SC1/series 45X, 27:307); at head of letter, “Sir F B.”; at foot of letter, “Sr F B. Bart.”

    961. To Lord Hillsborough

    Boston 30 March 1772

    Private

    My Lord, Mr Oliver who was one of the Justices of the Superior Court desired I would accept his resignation at the same [time] the Chief Justice & Mr. Cushing resigned.1 He gave me a Reason which was a very strong one that he had been impoverishing himself for 14 or 15 years by his posts & that the circumstances of his Estate would not admit of his continuing any longer not being able to support his familly without applying himself to his private business. I had received pretty strong assurances from Gov. Bernard that provision would be made for the Salaries of the Judges which I acquainted him with and the Salary of Chief Justice I thought would afford him a decent support and upon this encourage[ment] I prevailed upon him to accept of a Commission.2 There have been some letters lately received from persons who have been solliciting places in England intimating that no provision was like to be made for the Salary of an Attorney General and as that was looked upon more certain than the others he has signified his determination at the end of the year to quit his place.3 The Gentleman, who stands next, is best acquainted with the Law of any I know in the province but he is of weak nerves and, from experience, I have reason to doubt his firmness when there may be occasion for it, and I do not know anybody so likely to resist popular attempts to influence, as the present Chief Justice.4 I thought it prudent to say nothing upon this subject in a publick letter to your Lordship, but as I think it of great importance that this supreme Court should be encouraged, I could not omit acquainting your Lordship in a private Letter of the danger we are in; submitting to your Lordship to take such measures as you shall judge most proper. I am with the greatest respect My Lord &c.,

    AC (Massachusetts Archives, SC1/series 45X, 27:307–08); in EH’s hand.

    962. To Sir Francis Bernard

    March 31 1772

    Dear Sir, I wrote to you yesterday. The Vessel still lying in Nantasket for a wind Mr Bernard urges me to cover another letter to you and I take the same opportunity to tell you that Paxton & Burch called at the Province House this morning to let me know that it had been recomended to them to employ a new Printer Fleming instead of Green. I read to them what you wrote the 6 April.1 They are well stocked with blanks at present & may not have occasion for more until there shall be time for further orders. It requires much pains to secure persons in favour of Government. Green has behaved extremely well. He has lost all his business except that of the Commissioners. All their Stationary ware which they used to take of him they now take of Fleming. If he loses the printing it will be excessive hard. I dont think it more than Fleming deserves but he ought not to be served to the prejudice of Green. It will not be of so mischievous a tendency as if Fleming had been an opposer of Government. When any such who have not changed their measures & connexions are promoted it encourages all the rest to persevere in their opposition, nevertheless it discourages all the Friends to Government when they see one who has been remarkable so deserted & left to suffer.

    They are both alike to me & I have nothing in view from this letter but the Publick service. I am Dear Sir Yours Sincerely,

    AC (Massachusetts Archives, SC1/series 45X, 27:309); at foot of letter, “Sir F B.”

    963. To John Wentworth1

    Boston 3d April 1772

    Dear Sir, The Packet you receive herewith came to my hands on Tuesday evening. The Roads being bad I am informed there is no Carrier. I take the first opportunity by a private hand to forward it to you. The principal news has been taken up by the Printer of the Thursdays paper.2 Every good Subject but especially the Servants of the Crown must feel the distresses of our Royal Master. I hope the first accounts of the Denmark affair were ill-founded. The politicians in England are divided but those in favour of the innocence of the Queen have been continually gaining ground and it is now the prevailing opinion that the revolution is intirely owing to the machinations of the Dowager to place her own Son on the Throne. If so I hope it will raise the resentment of Britain and that She and her abettors will meet with the just reward of their wickedness. I am with very great regard and esteem Sir &c.,

    AC (Massachusetts Archives, SC1/series 45X, 27:309–10); in EH’s hand.

    964. To Unknown

    Boston 5 Ap. 1772

    Sir, I am much obliged to you for your favour by Capt Holland. If our Merchant Vessels had not been more obliging than the Packets your Letter would have contained the latest London news to this day.

    We have a great number of Vessels arrived within a week some with four weeks passage. I have duplicates of the Feb Mail but the contents of my January letters I am ignorant of but imagine they must have been of some importance to me if I could have known them before the meeting of my Assembly. It is to no purpose except to give offence to complain of the Packets. I do not remember that there has been a Packet the whole year except the December Packet which has been of any service to this province the letters & intelligence being several weeks behind those by the Merchant Vessels. I can give you but very little news more than you will see in the papers in return for what you obliged me with. Every loyal Subjects but His Majestys faithful servants more especially1 must very sensibly feel the troubles & grief of so good a King.2 The Denmark news came at first by a private letter of 31. Jany from a Gentleman who has the ear of Lord Sandwich with such shocking circumstances respecting both the King & Queen as made it probable that the whole of the disorders there were the effect of a general discontent and resentment in the body of the people, but this account has been lowering down by every vessel since and the last of Feby the prevailing opinion was favorable to the Queen and the whole was thought by many to be owing to the machinations of the Dowager Queen to place her Son upon the Throne and some Letters say it is not improbable that a British fleet may appear before Copenhagen in the course of the Summer. In every other respect there has not been a more pacifick prospect. Nothwithstanding the pompous account of the Russian Victories it is thought a few more will utterly incapacitate them for continuing the war any longer their navy being in a wretched state.3 I am told in private letters that nothing more is intended respecting America than a continuance of the second bounty on Lumber for 7. Years and some Regulations of the Tea duty but what they will be was not fully known. The last business of a publick nature before the H of C. was a Message from the King relating to the Marriages of the Royal family which it seems to me it must be difficult to regulate and restrain.4 My Predecessor Sir F.B. has had what his friends call a slight touch of the palsy. This I suppose puts an end to his Commission for Ireland. The Board notwithstanding the little opposition in the Irish parliament is fixed and all difficulty removed it is said by a few places Providentially falling & judiciously disposed of. I am with very great respect & esteem Your Excellency’s most obedient humble Servant,

    AC (Massachusetts Archives, SC1/series 45X, 27:311–12); partially in EH’s hand.